Proposed application

Coordinate resource operations without delegating safety authority.

ExtremeAI is in development. The capabilities and workflows described here are planned, not currently available product features.

Built around the people responsible

resource-sector operations leaders; accountable starting owner: maintenance-administration or contractor-coordination manager.

Where coordination becomes difficult

scattered maintenance records, incomplete contractor documentation and repeated operational reporting work.

Proposed workflows to explore

These are illustrative administrative or assistive applications, not live product features.

  • Maintenance-document request → retrieve approved records → prepare planner review.
  • Contractor intake → check administrative completeness → flag missing documentation.
  • Shift/report preparation → assemble permitted updates → surface inconsistencies.
  • Service-procurement request → organise records → prepare an authorised handoff.

How the planned platform could fit

restricted context, dependency tracking, approval checkpoints and evidence.

What a future evaluation should measure

Measures to establish against your current process, not results already achieved.

  • record completeness
  • reporting accuracy
  • review corrections and handoff delay

Decisions that stay with people

no equipment control, extraction planning, blasting guidance, environmental clearance or safety certification; restrict sensitive site information.

Questions for a discovery conversation

Which records are excluded from automation? Who confirms current instructions? What site/security review is needed?

What would need validation

site authority, current source versions, operational security and safety/professional review.

Start a conversation

Discuss the workflow, the boundaries and the result.

Tell us where work slows down, which decisions need oversight and what a useful result would look like.

Contact sales

In development. Prefer email? sales@extremeai.net